|
Determination of combustion
energies for the complexes of sodium diethyldithiocarbamate and 1,10-phenanthroline with
Eu(III), Gd(III), Tb(III) and Dy(III)
Zhu Li, Yang Xuwu, Chen Sanping, Gao
Shengli, Shi Qizhen
(Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Physico-Inorganic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Northwest
University, Xi'an Shaanxi 710069, China)
Received May 00, 2004; Supported by the
National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 20171036), Education Department of
Shaanxi Province (No. 01JK229) and Northwest University (No.02NW02) for financial support
Abstract Four ternary solid complexes,
Eu(Et2dtc)3(phen) (d), Gd(Et2dtc)3(phen) (e),
Tb(Et2dtc)3(phen) (f) and Dy(Et2dtc)3(phen)
(g), were synthesized with sodium diethyldithiocarbamate (NaEt2dtc),
1,10-phenanthroline (o-phen) and low hydrated lanthanide chlorides in absolute
ethanol by improved method of reference. IR spectra of the complexes showed that the RE3+
(RE=Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy) is coordinated with sulfur atoms of NaEt2dtc
and nitrogen atoms of o-phen. The constant-volume combustion energies of complexes,
, were determined by a precision
rotating-bomb calorimeter at 298.15 K. The standard enthalpies of combustion, , and standard enthalpies of formation, , were calculated for these complexes,
respectively.
Keywords RE(Et2dtc)3(phen), thermochemistry, combustion
energies, standard enthalpies of combustion, standard enthalpies of formation
The series of complexes lanthanide sulfide
have been largely used for the precursors of ceramics and thin film materials [1-4].
For instance, the complexes synthesized with [(alkyl)2dtc], o-phen·H2O
and lanthanide salts had been acted as the volatile precursors for preparing lanthanide
sulfide. Their friction properties in lubricant was investigated in literature [5],
and the preparation and properties of these complexes were also documented in literature [6].
In addition, the crystal structure and spectroscopic properties of Eu(Et2dtc)3(phen)
had been reported [7].
To our best knowledge,
thermodynamic data could offer better interpretation to the essence of lanthanide-sulfide
bonds and stability of this series of complexes, and no investigation has been carried out
concerning the thermochemical properties for these complexes. In this paper, their
standard enthalpies of combustion and standard enthalpies of formation have been
calculated on the basis of determination of the constant-volume energies combustion of
complexes. The final results would provide theoretical basis for enlarging their application
range.
1 EXPERIMENTAL
1.1 Reagents
Lanthanide chloride hydrate, RECl3·xH2O
(RE=Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy; x=3 - 4) were prepared according to Ref. [8]. Sodium
diethyldithiocarbamate (NaEt2dtc·3H2O) (b) are of A. R. grade from Shanghai
Reagent Company, 1,10-phenanthroline (o-phen·H2O) (c), absolute
ethanol and CHCl3 are of A. R. grade from Xi'an Chemical Reagent Company.
1.2 Preparation and composition of the complexes
The complexes were synthesized by the following chemical equation:
RECl3·xH2O + 3NaEt2dtc·3H2O
+ o-phen·H2O ----->
RE(Et2dtc)3(phen) + 3NaCl + (10+x)H2O
(1)
(RE=Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy )
8mmol RECl3·xH2O, 24mmol NaEt2dtc·3H2O
and 8 mmol o-phen ·H2O were dissolved in a minimal amount of
anhydrous ethanol, respectively, then alcoholic solution of o-phen and NaEt2dtc
were mixed together, and to it the salt alcoholic solution was dropped slowly when keeping
electromagnetic stirring. After the addition,
the mixture was allowed to stand 30 min and filtered. The crude product was rinsed by
three a small amount of absolute ethanol portions, followed by purifying with CHCl3.
The fine crystal was obtained and kept in vacuum over P4O10 to
dryness.
RE3+
were determined with EDTA by complexometric titration; C, H, N and S analyses were carried
out by an instrument of Vario EL III CHNOS of German. the final results were showed in
Table 1, which are identified as the general formula of RE(Et2dtc)3(phen).
Table 1 Analytical Results Related to
the composition for d, e, f and g
Complexes |
RE% |
S% |
C% |
N% |
H% |
d |
19.60
(19.56) |
24.77
(24.76) |
41.72
(41.74) |
9.04 (9.01) |
4.89 (4.93) |
e |
20.05
(20.10) |
24.51
(24.59) |
41.44
(41.46) |
8.97 (8.95) |
4.91 (4.90) |
f |
20.28
(20.27) |
24.52
(24.54) |
41.29
(41.37) |
8.99 (8.93) |
4.92 (4.89) |
g |
20.85
(20.63) |
24.89
(24.43) |
40.77
(41.18) |
8.80 (8.89) |
4.68 (4.86) |
a The data in brackets are calculated values.
1.3 Apparatus and experimental conditions
The constant-volume combustion energies of the complexes were determined by a precision
rotating-bomb calorimeter (RBC-type II)[9]. The main experimental procedures
were described previously [9]. The bicyclic support as showed in Fig.1 was used
as the holder of the crucible in the oxygen
bomb, which facilitates in the crucible stable relatively to the bomb when the bomb was
rotated crosswisely and vertically, assuring that combustion reaction is going completely.

Fig.1 Bicyclic structure of the crucible
support in the oxygen bomb
1.support; 2.x-axle; 3.outside ring; 4.y-axle; 5.inside ring
The initial temperature was regulated to (25.0000 ¡À 0.0005) ºC, and the
initial oxygen pressure was 2.5 Mpa. The digital indicator for temperature measurement was
used to promote the precision and accuracy of the experiment. The correct value of the
heat exchange was calculated according to Linio-Pyfengdelel-Wsava formula:
D(DT) = nV0
+ ( + -n )
(2)
where D(DT) denotes the correct value of the heat exchange; n
is the number of readings for the main (or reaction) period; V0 and Vn
are the rate of temperature change at the initial and final stages, respectively (V
is positive when temperature decreased); , is the average temperature of calorimeter at the
initial and final stages, respectively (average temperature for first and last reading); T0
is the last reading of the initial stage; Tn is the first reading of the
final stage; is the sum of all the
readings, except for the last one of the main period; is the constant.
The calorimeter was
calibrated with benzoic acid of 99.999 % purity (Chengdu Chemical Reagent Company), which
has an isothermal heat of combustion of -26434 J·g-1 at 25ºC. The calibrated experimental results with an uncertainty
of 4.18¡Á10-4 were summarized in Table 2. The energy equivalent of the
rotating-bomb calorimeter was calculated according to the following equation:
W= (3)
Where W is the energy equivalent of the
rotating-bomb calorimeter (in J·K-1), Q is the combustion
enthalpy of benzoic acid (in J·g-1), a is the mass of determined
benzoic acid (in g), G is the combustion enthalpy of Ni-Cr wire for ignition (0.9 J·cm-1),
b is the length of the actual Ni-Cr wire
consumed (in cm), 5.97 is the formation enthalpy and solution enthalpy of acid
corresponding to 1 mL of 0.1000 mol·L-1 solution of NaOH (in J·mL-1),
c is the volume (in mL) of consumed 0.1000 mol·L-1 solution of
NaOH and is the correct value of the temperature rise.
Table 2 Result for
Calibration of Energy Equivalent of the Rotating-bomb Calorimeter
No. |
Mass of complex
M/g |
Calibrated heat of combustion wire qc/J |
Calibrated heat of acid
qN/J |
Calibrated
DT/K |
Energy equivalent
W/J·K-1 |
1 |
0.99702 |
10.35 |
24.78 |
1.4834 |
17790.45 |
2 |
0.78940 |
8.10 |
20.89 |
1.1746 |
17789.88 |
3 |
0.83060 |
12.60 |
20.43 |
1.2382 |
17758.93 |
4 |
0.96869 |
12.60 |
17.43 |
1.4418 |
17780.82 |
5 |
0.99485 |
12.60 |
20.80 |
1.4800 |
17798.18 |
6 |
1.12328 |
9.09 |
21.85 |
1.6735 |
17761.41 |
7 |
0.90036 |
9.28 |
21.67 |
1.3429 |
17745.97 |
mean |
|
|
|
|
17775.09¡À7.43 |
The analytical
methods of final products (gas, liquid and solid) were the same as these in Ref[10],
the analytical results of the final products showed that the combustion reactions were
complete.
2 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
2.1 IR spectra of the complexes
IR spectra of the complexes are similar
because of their similar structure. Taking Eu(Et2dtc)3(phen) for
example, and referring to the literature [11,12], IR spectra of salt, ligands
and the complex depicted in Fig. 2.are assigned as follows: Compared with the spectra of
salt, NaEt2dtc·3H2O and o-phen·H2O
(3390, 3366 and 3388 cm-1), the characteristic absorption of hydroxyl group is
not present in the complex, showing that the complex do not consist of water. As those in
the ligand of o-phen, the peaks of 1624, 1589, 1572, and 1516cm-1 are
assigned to the skeleton vibration of benzene ring and the peaks of 852, and 730 cm-1
are assigned to the bend vibration of C¨CH in the complex, which display certain shifts in contrast with
those of (1617, 1587, 1561, 1504 cm-1) and (854, 739 cm-1) in the
ligand. It is thus assumed that two nitrogen atoms in the ligand of o-phen
coordinate to Eu3+. Contrasting with that of 1477 cm-1 in the ligand
of NaEt2dtc·3H2O, nCN
of the complex shifts to higher wave number, and presents a double-bond character in the
complex, which can be attributed to that NCS2- group has two main
forms of vibration[13]: (1) and (2)

(1)
(2)
(3)
the vibration intensity of
the latter one is enhanced when the two sulfur atoms of ligand coordinated
to Eu3+ to form the new cycle (3), thus nCN moves to the higher wave number. On
the other hand, increase of wave number of ncss stretching vibration is observed compared
with that of ligand. Obviously, this can be due to the new formed cycle and its formation
increases the vibration the intensity of nCN[12].
The changes of nCN and nCSS indicate that the two sulfur atoms of ligand coordinate
to Eu3+ in a bidentate manner. The final results demonstrate that it is an
octa-coordinated complex, and one pentaatomatomic ring and three tetraatomatomic rings are
formed. As for the other complexes, showing the similarity with the complex Eu(Et2dtc)3(phen),
the detailed data are listed in Table 3.

Fig. 2 IR spectra of the
ligands and the complex
(a)EuCl3·3.94H2O (b) NaEt2dtc·3H2O
(c) o-phen·H2O (d) Eu(Et2dtc)3(phen)
Table 3 Data of IR
Absorption for Main Groups of Ligands and Complexes (cm-1)
Complexes |
n(OH-1) |
n(C¨TC) |
n(C©¤H) |
n(CN) |
n(CSS) |
RECl3 ·xH2O |
3437-3441 |
|
|
|
|
b |
3366 |
|
|
1477 |
986 |
c |
3388 |
1617,1587, 1561, 1504 |
854, 739 |
|
|
d |
----- |
1624, 1589, 1572, 1516 |
852, 730 |
1482-1516 |
1001 |
e |
----- |
1624, 1589, 1572, 1516 |
852, 730 |
1481-1516 |
1000 |
f |
----- |
1624, 1589, 1572, 1516 |
852, 730 |
1482-1516 |
1002 |
g |
----- |
1624, 1589, 1572, 1517 |
853, 730 |
1482-1517 |
1001 |
2.2 Combustion energies of
the complexes
The methods of determination and calculation of the constant-volume combustion energies
for complexes are the same as for the calibration of the calorimeter with benzoic acid.
the values are calculated by means of the following equation:
(4)
where (complex, s) denotes the constant-volume
combustion energies of the complexes, QN is the
calibrated heat of acids, m is the mass in g of the complexes, the other symbols are as in equation
(3). The results of experiment were given in Table 4.
Table 4 Experimental
Results for the Combustion Energies for d, e, f and g
Complexes |
No. |
Mass of sample
m/g |
Calibrated heat of combustion wire Qc/J |
Calibrated heat of acid
QN/J |
Calibrated
/K |
Combustion energy of sample
- /J·g-1 |
d |
1 |
0.76470 |
12.60 |
1578.86 |
1.0548 |
22437.17 |
| ¡¡ |
2 |
0.78265 |
12.60 |
1615.92 |
1.0773 |
22386.23 |
| ¡¡ |
3 |
0.74369 |
12.60 |
1535.48 |
1.0247 |
22409.95 |
| ¡¡ |
4 |
0.75006 |
12.60 |
1548.63 |
1.0322 |
22379.83 |
| ¡¡ |
5 |
0.74235 |
12.60 |
1532.71 |
1.0219 |
22387.09 |
| ¡¡ |
6 |
0.74536 |
12.60 |
1538.93 |
1.0285 |
22445.73 |
| ¡¡ |
mean |
¡¡ |
¡¡ |
¡¡ |
¡¡ |
22407.67¡À11.52 |
e |
1 |
0.80140 |
12.60 |
1633.22 |
1.1686 |
23865.92 |
| ¡¡ |
2 |
0.81258 |
12.60 |
1656.00 |
1.1857 |
23883.59 |
| ¡¡ |
3 |
0.80035 |
12.60 |
1631.08 |
1.1664 |
23851.05 |
| ¡¡ |
4 |
0.79857 |
12.60 |
1627.45 |
1.1666 |
23913.21 |
| ¡¡ |
5 |
0.80820 |
12.60 |
1647.07 |
1.1787 |
23870.12 |
| ¡¡ |
6 |
0.81357 |
12.60 |
1658.02 |
1.1852 |
23814.12 |
| ¡¡ |
mean |
¡¡ |
¡¡ |
¡¡ |
¡¡ |
23870.84¡À10.42 |
f |
1 |
0.72684 |
11.70 |
1477.31 |
1.0037 |
22497.18 |
| ¡¡ |
2 |
0.73013 |
11.70 |
1484.06 |
1.0093 |
22522.89 |
| ¡¡ |
3 |
0.72755 |
12.60 |
1478.84 |
1.0069 |
22550.06 |
| ¡¡ |
4 |
0.73002 |
12.60 |
1483.86 |
1.0070 |
22469.32 |
| ¡¡ |
5 |
0.72545 |
12.60 |
1474.57 |
1.0026 |
22515.87 |
| ¡¡ |
6 |
0.72589 |
12.60 |
1475.46 |
1.0028 |
22505.89 |
| ¡¡ |
mean |
¡¡ |
¡¡ |
¡¡ |
¡¡ |
22510.20¡À11.02 |
g |
1 |
0.82838 |
12.60 |
1683.59 |
1.0842 |
21216.79 |
| ¡¡ |
2 |
0.83020 |
12.60 |
1687.29 |
1.0891 |
21270.73 |
| ¡¡ |
3 |
0.83479 |
11.70 |
1696.62 |
1.0936 |
21239.50 |
| ¡¡ |
4 |
0.82655 |
12.60 |
1679.87 |
1.0833 |
21248.91 |
| ¡¡ |
5 |
0.82850 |
12.60 |
1683.83 |
1.0873 |
21279.93 |
| ¡¡ |
6 |
0.82937 |
11.70 |
1685.60 |
1.0850 |
21207.27 |
| ¡¡ |
mean |
¡¡ |
¡¡ |
¡¡ |
¡¡ |
21243.86¡À11.75 |
2.3 Standard combustion enthalpies
of complexes
The standard combustion enthalpies of the complexes, (complexes, s, 298.15K), refer to the combustion enthalpy changes of the
following ideal combustion reaction at 298.15K and 100kPa.
RE(Et2dtc)3(phen) (s) + O2
(g) = RE2O3 (s)
+ 27CO2 (g) + 19 H2O+ 6 SO2 (g) + N2 (g) (5)
(RE=Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy)
The standard combustion enthalpies of the complexes are calculated by
the following equations:
(complex, s, 298.15K)= (complex, s, 298.15K)+ RT (6)
=ng(products)-ng(reactants)
(7)
where ng is the total amount in mole of gases present
as products or as reactants, R=8.314 J·K-1·mol-1,
T=298.15K. The results of the calculations are given in Table 5 for comparison.
Table 5 Combustion Energies,
Standard Combustion Enthalpies and Standard Enthalpies of Formation for d, e,
f and g at 298.15 K
Complexes |
( kJ·mol-1)
|
( kJ·mol-1)
|
( kJ·mol-1)
|
d |
-17410.63 ¡À
8.95 |
-17429.84 ¡À
8.95 |
-1238.06 ¡À
9.75 |
e |
-18673.71 ¡À
8.15 |
-18692.92 ¡À
8.15 |
-51.28 ¡À
9.17 |
f |
-17646.95 ¡À
8.64 |
-17666.16 ¡À
8.64 |
-1084.04 ¡À
9.49 |
g |
-16730.21 ¡À
9.25 |
-16749.42 ¡À
9.25 |
-2019.68 ¡À
10.19 |
2.4 Standard
enthalpies of formation of the complexes
The standard enthalpies of formation of the compounds, (complex, s, 298. 15K), are calculated by Hess's law according to the above
thermochemical equation (5)
(RE(Et2dtc)3(phen),
s) = [ (RE2O3, s) + 27 (CO2, g) + 19 (H2O,l)+
+ 6 (SO2, g) +  (N2
, g)] - (RE(Et2dtc)3(phen),
s) (8)
where (Eu2O3, s) =
(-1663.00 ¡À 1.62) kJ·mol-1; (Gd2O3, s) = (-1815.60 ¡À 3.60) kJ·mol-1;
(Tb2O3, s) = (-1827.6
¡À 2.0) kJ·mol-1; (Dy2O3,
s) = (-1865.39 ¡À 3.89) kJ·mol-1, (CO2, g) = (-393.51 ¡À 0.13) kJ·mol-1, (H2O, l) = (-285.830 ¡À 0.042) kJ·mol-1,
(SO2, g) = (-296.81 ¡À 0.20) kJ·mol-1[14,15]£¬ The results of calculation are
also listed in Table 5.

Fig.3 Plot of fH against the
atomic numbers (ZRE) of middle rare-earth for the complexes
¡ñ. ; ¡ö. 
In Fig.3, values of the complexes are plotted against the atomic numbers of
middle rare-earth. obviously, they appears as curve relationship not linear, suggesting a
certain amount of covalence is present in the chemical bond between the RE3+
and ligands, which is in agreement with Nephelauxetic effect of 4f electrons of rare earth
ions.
REFERENCES
[1] Matthew J A, Helen R, David A
R. J. Mater Chem. 2000, 10: 2842.
[2] Bessergenev V I, Ivanova E N, Kovaleskaya Ya A et al. Spring Meeting of Electrochem.
Soc. Los Angeles. 1996: 105.
[3] Kuzmina N P, Ivanov R A, Paramonov S E et al. Proc.-Electochem.Soc. 1997, 97-25: 880.
[4]] Ivanov R A, Korsakov I E, Kuzmina N P et al. J. Mendeleev. Commun. 2000, 3: 98.
[5] Zhang Z F, Su C Y, Liu W M et al. J. Wear. 1996, 192: 6.
[6] Zhou R, Sun Y H. J. Xinjiang Univ. (Natural Sci. Edi.). 1997, 14 (4): 67.
[7] Su C Y, Tan M Y, Tang N et al. J. Coord. Chem. 1996, 38: 207.
[8] Su M Z, Li G P. J. Chemistry.(Huaxue Tongbao), 1979, 43: 34.
[9] Yang X W, Chen S P, Gao S L et al. J. Instrumentation Science & Technology. 2002,
30 (3): 311.
[10] Marthada V K. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standard. 1980, 85: 467.
[11] Dong Q N. IR Spectroscopy. Beijing : Beijing Chemical and
Industrial Press, 1979.
[12] Nakamoto K. (Huang D R, Wang R Q. translated) Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic
and Coordination Compounds. Beijing: Beijing Chemical and Industrial Press (4th
Edi), 1991.
[13] Nakamoto K, Fujita J, Condrate R A et al. J. Chem. Phys. 1963, 39 (2): 423.
[14] Rederick D R. Experimental Thermochemistry,
Interscience Publishers Ltd., London, 1956, 88.
[15] Robert C W. CRC Handbook of
Chemistry and Physics, Chemical Rubber Publishing Company, Cleveland, 1977-1978, 55: D45.
¡¡
¡¡
|