Cao Chengxi, Zhou Shulin ,# He Youzhao, Zhou Tianchen,## Qian Yitai( Dept. of Chemistry, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026; # Institute of Allergy Reaction, Wannan Medical College, Anhui Wuhu 241001;## Dept. of Light & Chemical Industry, Wuhu Professional Technology University, Anhui Wuhu 241002) Received Feb. 16, 2000; Supported mainly by the National Natural Scientific Foundation of China (No. 29775014, 29975026), partly by the Health Committee of China (No. 98-2-334)) Abstract The mechanism of "pre-precipitate zone" observed after
the experiments of moving chemical reaction boundary (MCRB) formed with cobalt and
hydroxyl ions in agarose gel is still unclear. In order to elucidate the mechanism, two
methods, viz., the "cutting gel after run of MCRB" and "ionic
diffusive reaction in gel", are designed by the authors. The experimental results of
the former method showed no "pre-precipitate zone", and the latter method formed
ionic diffusive reaction zone that is very similar to the "pre-precipitate
zone". The results directly demonstrate that the "pre-precipitate zone" is
produced by the diffusive reaction between cobalt and hydroxyl ions remaining in the gel
after the run of MCRB. In addition, the procedure of ionic diffusive reaction may be of
significance for the study on ionic diffusive, diffusive reaction and diffusive reaction
boundary. In 1971, Demen and Rigole[1,2]
firstly advanced the idea of precipitate reaction front of electromigration (viz.,
moving chemical reaction boundary, MCRB) between reaction ions, such as hydroxyl and
cobalt ions, and performed the experiments of electromigration reaction formed by cobalt
and hydroxyl ions. In 1993, Bocek's group[3,4] advanced the concept of
stationary neutralization reaction boundary and used this concept to study the mechanism
of isoelectric focusing(IEF)[5,6]. 1. EXPERIMENTAL
Fig. 1. The diagrammatic
sketches of the MCRB experiment formed with cobalt and hydroxyl ions and of the
"pre-precipitate zone" developing after the MCRB run. A) the beginning of
MCRB created with cobalt and hydroxyl ions, B) the end of MCRB, and C) the
"pre-precipitate zone" developing after the run of MCRB.
Fig. 2. The diagrammatic
sketch of observing the "pre-precipitate zone" after cutting the gel just ahead
the boundary formed just after MCRB run.
1.2.3 Experiments of ionic
diffusive reaction in gel The diffusive reaction between cobalt and hydroxyl ions was designed as following. As shown in Fig. 3, the tube was filled with 1% agarose gel containing 0.1 N background electrolytes KCl and 0.01 N CoCl2. Then one end of the tube was covered with plastic film, after that, the tube was inserted into rube plug. Finally, the tube was placed into a larger tube containing 5.0 ml solution of 0.1 N KCl and 0.01 N NaOH, the time began. The length of diffusive reaction zone can directly be determined and photographed at any time during the diffusive reaction between cobalt and hydroxyl ions.
Fig. 3. The diagrammatic
sketch of procedure of diffusive reaction between cobalt and hydroxyl ions in 1%(w/v)
agarose gel. For more details, see the text.
2. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS
Fig. 4. The
"pre-precipitate zone" developing after the MCRB experiments created with cobalt
and hydroxyl ions in 1% (w/v) agarose gel. The arrows indicate the boundaries formed just
after the end of runs, the symbols + and - imply the cathodic and anodic ends
respectively. Those blue-yellow zones from the anodic ends to the arrows are the
precipitate zones formed during the runs, those blue zones under the arrows are the
"pre-precipitate zones" developing after the runs of MCRB. Conditions: [CoCl2]
= 0.01 N; [NaOH] = 0.01 N; 0.1 N background electrolyte KCl; length of tube = 90 mm; run
time = 20 minutes; A) constant voltage = 260 V, ID = 5.7 mm; B) 260 V, ID=
5.8 mm; C) 300 V, ID = 6.0 mm.
If the former reason
causes the "pre-precipitate zone", there would not be "pre-precipitate
zone" to be observed after cutting the gel just ahead the boundary formed after the
run (see the method 2 in Fig. 2). If the latter leads to the "pre-precipitate
zone", there will be "pre-precipitate zone". In order to test the above
deduction, we performed the MCRB experiments described in Fig. 1 at first, and after the
completion of run we carried out the experiment in accordance with method 2 shown in Fig.
2. The results are shown in Figs. 5 that there is no "pre-precipitate zone" to
be observed. Therefore, it is the former that causes the "pre-precipitate zone".
![]() ![]()
Fig. 6. The precipitate
boundaries and zones developing during the "experiments of diffusive reaction"
created with cobalt and hydroxyl ions in accordance with method 3. The arrows indicate the
boundaries. A) No any precipitate boundary and zone are observed before the
experiment with two tubes. B) The photograph after the experiments about 32 hours,
the length of the zones is about 26 mm as shown by the rule. C) the photograph
after the experiments about 56 hours, the length of zones is about 30 mm, there are a
series of blue disks near the arrows, after this time, no growth of the precipitate
boundary occurs. Conditions: 1% agarose gel; [CoCl2] = 0.01 N; [NaOH] = 0.01 N;
0.1 N KCl; length of tube = 90 mm, ID = 5.7 mm.
From the above results and discussions, one can conclude that the pre-precipitate zone is caused by the diffusive reaction between cobalt and hydroxyl ions remaining in the gel after the MCRB run, but not the existence of very fine precipitate of Co(OH)2 formed during the run and moving ahead the boundary under the electric field. In addition, the procedure of diffusive reaction in Fig. 3 may be of significance for the studies on the ionic diffusion, diffusive reaction and diffusive reaction boundary[19,20]. Acknowledgment The authors sincerely wish to thank Dr. Ge Pinshi and Lin Xuodong for their aids to obtain the photographs. REFERENCES | ||||
|
|